![]() First, the earliest substantial manuscripts of the New Testament come from the third century. Naturally, this news of a first-century copy of Mark generated a great deal of interest.Ī first-century fragment of Mark’s gospel would be significant for several reasons. He later signed a non-disclosure agreement and was bound to silence until the Mark fragment was published.Īs a general rule, earlier manuscripts get us closer to the original text than later manuscripts because there are assumed to be fewer copies between them and the autographs (the original copies of the NT writings, most likely lost to history). When pressed for more information, Wallace refrained from saying anything new. The manuscript, Wallace claimed, was to be published later that year in a book from Brill, an academic publisher that has since begun publishing items in the Museum of the Bible collection. He had no apologetic motive for assigning the early date. This preeminent authority was not an evangelical Christian, either. Ehrman, Wallace reported that a fragment of Mark’s gospel, dated to the first century, had been discovered.Īs unlikely as a first-century Gospel manuscript is, the fragment was allegedly dated by a world-class specialist. Wallace, senior research professor of New Testament at Dallas Theological Seminary, seemed to confirm Carroll’s statement. In late 2011, manuscript scholar Scott Carroll-then working for what would become the Museum of the Bible in Washington D.C.- tweeted the tantalizing announcement that the earliest-known manuscript of the New Testament was no longer the second-century John Rylands papyrus (P52). The reason stems from the unusual way that this manuscript became famous before it became available. One might expect happiness at such a publication, but this important fragment actually disappointed many observers. But upon closer examination of the two, there seems to be good ground to admit that they originally formed but one volume, or at least were long kept as one volume.The Egypt Exploration Society has recently published a Greek papyrus that is likely the earliest fragment of the Gospel of Mark, dating it from between A.D. They have been separated on the strength of the fact that each of the two bears its own distinct pagination. ![]() 29, n.2, " and, when purchased, formed one package. Related fragments possibly include: M.617. Colors: Dark reddish orange (Centroid 38), strong yellow (84), dark yellowish green (137), dark grayish blue (187). 27v.ĭecoration: Headpiece, tailpeice ornaments, paragraphus signs, coronis, major initial, initials, page numbers. 7r, 9r, 27v, 29r, 29v superlinear additions (twice) on fol. 43v: "month of Baʼūna, second Sunday, morning of the Resurrection."Ĭorrections: Marginal additions on fols. 20v: "month of Baʼūna (May 26-June 24 Julian), first Sunday, morning of the Resurrection" fol. Marginal apparatus: Greek (red) and Coptic (black) kephalaia divisions, with numbers in fore-edge of margins, placed inside or next to major initials accompaniesd by large painted vine-scroll coronis sign (and sometimes birds) on versos and framed by painted vine-scroll coronis on rectos. Monograms on first and last page of the quire. No remains of signatures (all top inner margins wanting). Punctuation: Raised dot in conjunction with a reddened dotted diple and a space.Ĭollation: Probably signed on first and last page of the quire, top inner margin. ![]() 8v, 21v (end of Matthew), 27v (end of quire). Exceeding letters of last line of the page written below end of the line on rectos of fols. 22 at beginning of Mark ekthesis, major initial, line of enlarged letters, and paragraphus sign (large vine-scroll coronis or bird or both) setting off major textual units ancient Greek and Coptic chapter numbers (in red and black respectively) located on rectos within major initial (if shape permits) or above it, and within coronis on versos ekthesis and reddened enlarged initial setting off paragraphs. Divisions: Brown leather tab fastened of fore-edge of fol. Text reads: Lord, have mercy with this miserable one who wrote (this), Biktōr. 44v: Memorial (for the copyist?) in Coptic: For and by Biktōr. 5 and 6) Mark wants 13 leaves (2 between fols. Manuscript gospels of Matthew and Mark, written and decorated in Egypt.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |